Effective academic reading involves questioning, evaluating, and summarizing literature to build a foundation for your own evidence-based arguments.

How can you read academic literature in a way that's effective and critical? The first step is to come up with a main question that you want to answer, along with some more detailed review questions. This way, you're reading to find answers to your own questions, not just following the path laid out by the authors of the papers you're reading. One of the most important skills you can develop is the ability to evaluate how useful a paper is. To do this, you need to identify the arguments that the authors are making. These arguments are made up of conclusions and the evidence used to support them. You need to decide if the evidence really does support the conclusions. Be on the lookout for arguments that are incomplete, either because they're missing a conclusion or because they don't have enough evidence. You should also question any logical flaws you find, like conclusions that aren't properly supported by the evidence. Be wary of broad conclusions that are based on limited evidence. And don't just rely on summaries of papers - try to read the original sources whenever you can. There's a structured approach you can use to analyze papers, called the five Critical Synopsis Questions. The first question is: Why am I reading this? This should match up with your review question. The second question is: What are the authors trying to do? You need to figure out their purpose. The third question is: What do the authors say that's relevant? Make a note of any points that could be useful. The fourth question is: How convincing is what the authors say? This is where you critically evaluate their arguments. The final question is: In conclusion, what use can I make of this? This is where you assess how valuable the paper is for your own goals. Answering these questions will help you understand, evaluate, and categorize what you're reading. Once you've done this, you can move from a Critical Synopsis to a Critical Summary. This means using your analysis to present the original work in your own words, in a way that's accurate and critical. The more you practice this kind of critical reading, the stronger a foundation you'll build for developing your own arguments, based on evidence, in your own academic writing. The more you question and interrogate texts using focused questions, the better you'll get at writing in a way that's self-critical.

The "mental map" provides a structured method for critically analyzing academic literature, considering factors like claim certainty, knowledge type, and literature category.

A useful tool to help you understand what writers aim to convey in their work is a "mental map". This map consists of four main components: Firstly, consider the two key dimensions that can vary in the claims made in academic writing - the level of certainty and the extent of generalization. The evidence provided should align with these claims. For instance, if a claim is very certain and generalized, it needs a lot of evidence to back it up. On the other hand, claims that are tentative or specific to a certain context require less extensive evidence. Secondly, academic writing reflects three types of knowledge: theoretical, research, and practical. Each type contributes a different kind of evidence to support claims. Thirdly, there are four categories of academic literature: theoretical, research, practice, and policy. Each category has its own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to making persuasive claims. Fourthly, there are five intellectual pursuits that drive academic work: knowledge-for-understanding, knowledge-for-critical evaluation, knowledge-for-action, instrumentalism, and reflexive action. These pursuits represent the various purposes and values that shape the literature. In all academic literature, "tools for thinking" such as concepts, perspectives, metaphors, theories, models, assumptions, and ideologies are used to construct arguments and claims to knowledge. As a critical reader, being aware of these elements of the mental map can help you evaluate the purpose, nature, assumptions, and credibility of the claims made in what you read. This awareness also guides critical writing where you make your own supported claims. In essence, the mental map offers a structured method for navigating academic literature and developing insightful critical analyses.

Conducting a thorough critical analysis of an academic text involves a set of 10 questions that examine the text's purpose, claims, evidence, and limitations, enhancing critical reading skills and paving the way for a comprehensive critical review.

How can you conduct a thorough critical analysis of an academic text? This process involves a set of 10 Critical Analysis Questions. These questions are an extension of the 5 Critical Synopsis Questions used for initial quick reviews. The purpose of these 10 questions is to closely examine the purpose, claims, evidence, assumptions, limitations, and relation to experience of the text. Each Critical Analysis Question comes with sub-questions and prompts to help you delve deeper into key aspects. Along with each question, there's an explanation of why that question is important. For instance, the second question, which is about the type of literature, helps you anticipate its characteristics and potential limitations of claims. The third question uncovers the aims and target audience of the text. The fourth question helps you identify the main claims and argument to focus your analysis. Questions five to nine help you evaluate the evidence, theory, values, relation to other work, and match with experience backing the claims. Performing a comprehensive Critical Analysis is a stepping stone towards writing a Critical Review, which is a summary of your evaluation of a text. This process helps you become familiar with using the mental map of tools for thinking and critical questions to navigate academic literature. With practice, these tools become automatic habits that enhance your critical reading skills. You're encouraged to take the initiative to decide which questions and answers are most significant for each text, based on your own review questions and purpose.

Writing a critical review of academic texts requires a structured approach, drawing from prior critical analyses to create insightful, comparative evaluations.

Let's talk about how to write a critical review of an academic text based on a completed critical analysis. The goal is to create a structured review of about 1000 words. This review should include an introduction that outlines the purpose and review questions, a section that introduces the text and the authors' intentions, a section that summarizes the key points relevant to the review questions, a section that evaluates these points, and a conclusion that assesses the text's contribution to answering the review questions. To create each section, you should draw directly from your critical analysis responses. For instance, your introduction should use the review questions you've identified, the section on the authors' intentions should use the type of literature and intellectual project you've identified, the section on key points should use the main points you've identified, and the evaluation section should use your assessments of evidence, theory, values, and relation to other work. Now, what if you're reviewing multiple research texts? You can adapt the structure we've discussed to synthesize and compare across texts. You'd introduce the texts as a group, summarize and compare key points across the texts, evaluate the points as a group, and conclude by assessing the combined contribution of the texts to answering the review questions. In both scenarios, having completed critical analyses of the texts gives you the material you need to create a structured critical review. The more critical analyses you do, the easier it becomes to write insightful comparative reviews. It's recommended to practice using this mental map, analysis questions, and review structures until they become second nature, enabling you to write flexible, well-supported critical reviews.

Crafting a compelling dissertation involves weaving the critical literature reviews into your work.

Let's imagine you're tasked with writing a dissertation based on empirical research. The goal is to create a compelling argument that will captivate your reader. To do this, you need to weave critical literature reviews into your work, ensuring that your research process aligns with the structure of your written account. This can be achieved in six steps. Start by introducing your broad research topic and central question. Then, outline the specific aims that will help you delve into your topic. These could be substantive, theoretical, or methodological in nature. Next, you'll want to dive into critical literature reviews. These should be focused and driven by review questions that are substantive, theoretical, and methodological. The information you gather here will guide your decisions about the design of your empirical study. Think of these reviews as sections in a chapter dedicated to literature review. With your literature review complete, you can now design your research. Use the literature to guide you in formulating specific research questions, choosing the right methods, and designing the tools you'll use to collect data. Once you've collected your data, it's time to present and analyze it. This will provide the empirical evidence you need to answer your research questions. After analyzing your data, discuss your findings. Relate them back to the relevant literature to interpret their significance and implications. Finally, wrap up your dissertation by summarizing what you've learned from your investigation. Reflect critically on any limitations, evaluate the certainty and generalizability of your findings, and propose future research avenues. Remember, critical literature reviews are crucial for supporting your claims at each step of your argument. By linking your empirical work back to the central question you initially posed, you'll create a focused review and research questions. This requires careful planning and drafting to integrate critical reading, the research process, data analysis, and writing into a logical, cohesive narrative that convinces your reader.

Structuring a dissertation involves using logic checksheets, outline structures, and linkage tracker tests to ensure a coherent argument that is well-supported by literature.

Let's break down the process of structifying a dissertation that reports empirical research into three practical tools. Firstly, we have a logic checksheet. This tool helps you keep track of your argument as it develops through six crucial steps. You start by introducing the general topic and the central question. Then, you move on to specify your substantive, theoretical, and methodological goals. The next step involves conducting focused literature reviews to inform your research design. After that, you formulate specific research questions, design data collection instruments, and plan how you will present and discuss your findings. Secondly, we use an outline structure. This tool helps you align your chapters with the logical steps mentioned above. Your dissertation will include an introduction, a literature review, a research design, findings, a discussion, and a conclusion. This tool also highlights where critical literature reviews provide essential support for your argument. Thirdly, we have a linkage tracker test. This tool encourages you to ensure that each section of your dissertation contributes to your overall argument. Throughout this process, it's important to integrate critical reading and self-critical writing to develop a convincing argument. You can link literature to your goals through focused review questions. Research questions should derive from review questions to connect your empirical work back to the central question. You need to support your claims at each step with literature. To ensure there are no gaps in your argument, plan your written account early, draft sections as your research progresses, revise based on new insights, and apply the logical flow tests. You'll also find advice on how to adapt the generic structure, write for examiners, and prepare for an oral defense. These tools will help you construct a tightly focused, coherent dissertation that develops strong support for your claims and answers the initial central question you posed.

Presenting a dissertation requires selective use of source material and new thinking to create focused, logical arguments tailored for different audiences and purposes.

Imagine you've just finished your dissertation and you're tasked with presenting your research in academic papers and conferences. The key here is to use your source material selectively to create a compelling argument that fits within your limited space and time. When writing a paper, think of it as a condensed version of your dissertation. Start by briefly introducing your topic and the gap in knowledge that your research fills. Then, provide a highly focused review of the literature that's relevant to your topic. Remember, you're not trying to include every single reference, but rather the most important ones that show where your ideas come from. After that, state your methods and findings, and then relate these findings back to the literature you reviewed earlier. Finally, conclude with the key messages of your research. When it comes to oral presentations, you'll need to be even more selective because your audience won't have the chance to go back and review what you've said. Start by quickly introducing the central question, your aims, and the context of the knowledge gap. Then, instead of a full literature review, just present the key issues and questions that have arisen from your reading. Briefly state your methods, then focus on your findings and discussion. Conclude by summarizing the key questions and their answers. If there are elements you didn't fully cover, you can address these in the question and answer session. In both situations, your completed dissertation serves as a foundation from which you can extract elements to create focused, logical presentations. However, you'll need to do some new thinking to determine the most important points for each audience and purpose. By combining the skills of critical reading and self-critical writing, you can adapt your complex work into concise arguments that are tailored for wider scholarly communication.

Home

Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates - Book Summary (2024)

Mike Wallace, Alison Wray

The book "Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates" is a comprehensive guide that provides postgraduate students with practical strategies and techniques to critically analyze academic texts and effectively communicate their own research.

Key Ideas

When it comes to choosing academic texts for critical reading, making effective choices is crucial. With a plethora of literature at your disposal, it's important to be discerning. Start by creating a comprehensive list of potential sources. You can do this by using various search tools such as library catalogs, journal indexes, and citation tracking. Once you have your long list, you can then narrow it down to the most useful items for your specific needs.

Remember, different types of texts serve different purposes. For instance, textbooks are great for providing overviews and helping students get oriented, but they often oversimplify complex topics. On the other hand, research literature presents original studies and data analysis. Theoretical literature, meanwhile, offers explanatory models and hypotheses, while practice literature outlines applied activities and techniques. Lastly, policy literature promotes changes based on certain values.

To ensure you're getting the best information, look for quality cues in your sources. These can include peer reviews, revision histories, the expertise of the author, and the reputation of the publisher. Whenever possible, opt for primary research over secondary summaries. Also, don't forget to vary your reading strategy. Sometimes, you might need to scan for specific details, other times you might need to skim for a general overview, and in some cases, you might need to read intensively the most relevant parts.

Don't limit yourself to just search engines when using the Internet for research. Scholarly databases can be a goldmine of information. Treat Wikipedia as a starting point, not the final destination. If you come across key claims, make sure to find the original academic source for verification. When referencing internet sources, be meticulous. Include dates and URLs for future reference.

In conclusion, start your research with a broad scope, capturing as many relevant sources as possible. Then, focus your intensive reading on the most important items. Keep in mind the different types of texts, assess their quality, vary your reading strategy, and use the Internet wisely. By making discerning selections, you can make your critical reading more efficient and effective.

"Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates" by Mike Wallace and Alison Wray is a comprehensive guide that provides postgraduate students with the necessary tools to critically engage with academic texts and produce their own. The book emphasizes the importance of critical thinking in academic writing and offers practical strategies for developing and improving these skills. It covers a wide range of topics, including understanding the nature of arguments, identifying biases, evaluating evidence, and constructing a coherent and persuasive argument.

10 Actions to Implement Learnings:

Practice Critical Reading: Regularly engage with academic texts and practice the critical reading strategies outlined in the book.
Develop a Critical Mindset: Approach every text with a critical mindset, questioning the author's assumptions, biases, and evidence.
Use the 'Three-Stage Reading Process': This process involves previewing the text, reading it in detail, and then reviewing it.
Take Effective Notes: Use the note-taking strategies suggested in the book to capture key points, arguments, and evidence from the texts you read.
Evaluate Evidence: Always evaluate the evidence provided in a text. Consider its source, reliability, and relevance to the argument.
Identify Biases: Be aware of potential biases in the texts you read, including the author's personal biases and any biases inherent in the methodology used.
Construct Coherent Arguments: Use the strategies provided in the book to construct your own coherent and persuasive arguments.
Write Regularly: Practice your writing skills regularly. This will help you to improve your ability to express your ideas clearly and persuasively.
Seek Feedback: Seek feedback on your writing from peers, tutors, or mentors. This can help you to identify areas for improvement and develop your critical writing skills.
Reflect on Your Learning: Regularly reflect on your learning and progress. Consider what strategies are working well for you and what areas you need to work on.

Want a high quality book summary? Send us your wish!

Heard about a book? Check the summary!

Find more than 1 million summaries!

We are building a new experience around books!

Discover, discuss and engage with books in new ways, powered by AI! Become an early adopter to fight the global reading crisis.

Discover the Snackz AI catalogue

Literature & Arts

As You Like it

Draußen vor der Tür

Cyrano von Bergerac (Weltklassiker)

Hamlet, Prinz von Dännemark

Die Pietisterey im Fischbein-Rocke. Komödie

Die wichtigsten Werke von William Shakespeare (Zweisprachige Ausgabe: Deutsch-Englisch)

The Master and Margarita

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time GCSE Student Guide

Life Is a Dream

Pandemie

Business & Economics

Die Gesetze der Gewinner

Oh Sh*t... Was nun?

Grit

Tomorrowmind

Working Identity

Who

Der pragmatische Programmierer

Der Trillion Dollar Coach

Tradingpsychologie

Higher Status

Education & Learning

Critical Thinking

Das Einmaleins der Hebelzertifikate, CFDs und Optionsscheine für Einsteiger

Wired for Story

Theories of Primitive Religion

The Montessori Toddler

How We Learn

The Song of the Cell

Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates

Machine Learning For Dummies

Das Lied der Zelle

Philosophy

Doing Good Better

Gutes besser tun

Kleine Philosophen

God, Human, Animal, Machine

Veronika Decides to Die

Consciousness Beyond Life

Letters from a Stoic

Bhagavad Gita

Also sprach Zarathustra

Critique of Pure Reason

Fiction

Pete the Cat: 5-Minute Pete the Cat Stories

Das kleine Böse Buch 3 (Das kleine Böse Buch, Bd. 3)

What to Do When You're Not Sure What to Do

The Lorax

Rosie and the Friendship Angel

Percy Jackson and the Sea of Monsters: The Graphic Novel (Book 2)

Mein Lotta-Leben (20). Immer dem Panda nach

Game of Gold

Das Reich der sieben Höfe – Silbernes Feuer

The First Cat in Space and the Soup of Doom

Miscellaneous Cluster

When Women Sexually Abuse Men

The Loudest Silence

Die Skins

Anna Karenina

Snow crash

The Alchemist

The sun sister : Electra's story

The right book at the right time will change your life.

Company

Privacy

Imprint

Cookie Settings

Get the books directly into your inbox!

✅ New Release

✅ Book Recommendation

✅ Book Summaries