The history of the Kurds is marked by political dissent, tribal conflicts, and a rising nationalism amidst the decline of the Ottoman Empire.

Let's delve into the history of the Kurds in the Middle East, tracing their journey from the early times up to the end of World War One. The Kurds emerged as a unique ethnic group following the Arab conquests in the 7th century. They became known for their political dissent and rebellion against central authorities. Over time, several Kurdish dynasties and principalities sprouted up in the borderlands between the Ottoman and Persian empires. Both the Ottomans and Persians, or Qajars, attempted to control the Kurdish tribes, but their success varied. Moving into the 19th century, the Kurdish principalities faced suppression due to the centralizing reforms of the Ottoman and Qajar states. This led to an increase in lawlessness and tribal conflicts in Kurdistan. As the power of the Ottomans waned, Russia emerged as a new threat. They aimed to incite separatism among Ottoman minorities, including the Kurds and Armenians. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the first signs of Kurdish nationalism began to appear among the educated Kurds. Following the 1908 Young Turk revolution, Kurdish cultural societies were established, advocating for greater autonomy. When World War One broke out, the Ottoman government, fearing that the Kurds would side with Russia, initiated severe measures against them. Many Kurds, driven by fear and religious motivations, participated in the Armenian genocide of 1915. As the war ended and the Ottoman empire began to crumble, the future of the Kurds remained uncertain. The British took control of the Mosul vilayet and found themselves having to navigate complex tribal politics. This period was a crucial one in Kurdish history, marked by key events and figures, and significant developments. It was a time that saw the tensions between central authorities and peripheral minorities intensify, and Kurdish nationalism rise as the Ottoman system declined.

Despite internal divisions and external repression, the Kurdish quest for autonomy persisted, shaping their national consciousness throughout the 20th century.

This key idea is a brief overview of the history of the Kurdish people from the end of World War I through the 1930s, with a focus on those living in what is now Turkey, Iraq, and Iran. The Kurds faced significant challenges in their quest for autonomy or independence following the fall of the Ottoman Empire. They were deeply divided along tribal, religious, linguistic, and socio-economic lines, which made it difficult for them to unite behind shared objectives. Additionally, they struggled to establish effective political leadership that could rally mass support and negotiate with European powers. In Turkey, the Kurds initially joined forces with Mustafa Kemal's nationalist movement to counter threats from the Greeks, Armenians, and others. However, once Turkey was secure, Kemal implemented a harsh policy aimed at forging a unified Turkish national identity and suppressing Kurdish identity. Kurdish uprisings were brutally suppressed in the 1920s and 1930s. The Kurdish language and culture were outlawed, many Kurdish villages were destroyed, and their populations displaced. The abolition of the caliphate further alienated the religiously devout Kurds. Despite this repression, Kurdish national consciousness continued to grow slowly among the emerging professional classes. In Iraq, the British had promised the Kurds self-determination and autonomy during World War I to secure their support. However, once the new state of Iraq was established, the British repeatedly reneged on these promises in order to maintain control and stability. The Kurdish regions of Iraq were gradually incorporated into the Iraqi state, often against the wishes of the Kurds. Rebellions led by figures like Sheikh Mahmud Barzinji were quelled by joint British-Iraqi military action. In Iran, tribal leader Simko Shikak tried to establish an independent Kurdish territory in the early 1920s. He enjoyed some initial successes but was ultimately defeated by Reza Shah's centralized forces. Reza Shah then introduced policies aimed at subjugating the Kurdish tribes, settling nomads, abolishing tribal titles, and promoting the Persian language. Many Kurdish chiefs were killed or exiled, and Kurdish identity was suppressed.

The Kurdish nationalist movement in Iran, born post World War I, has endured a century of repression and internal divisions, yet remains fueled by the persistent demand for autonomy.

The Kurdish nationalist movement in Iran was spanning from 1918 to 1993. This journey begins with the birth of Kurdish nationalism following World War I and the Simko rebellion. We then move on to the fleeting existence of the Mahabad Republic in 1946, and finally, the ongoing battle for Kurdish autonomy against the Pahlavi regime and the subsequent Islamic Republic. In the aftermath of World War I, a power vacuum emerged. This void allowed Kurdish tribal leaders to claim a level of independence from the Iranian government. Reza Shah attempted to limit the influence of these tribal chiefs, but the landlord class remained largely untouched. When Reza Shah was overthrown in 1941, Kurdish leaders like Qazi Muhammad, backed by Soviet support, sought autonomy or even independence for Kurdistan. This led to the proclamation of the Republic of Mahabad in 1946. However, this republic was short-lived, lasting less than a year before Iranian forces regained control of the region. Moving into the 1950s and 1960s, the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran (KDPI) fought for Kurdish rights under the Pahlavi regime, but their efforts were unsuccessful. The KDPI was nearly wiped out due to repression by SAVAK, the secret police. During this time, socioeconomic changes such as land reform and migration began to foster a sense of Kurdish identity that transcended class boundaries. In the late 1970s, the Kurds resisted the forces of the newly formed Islamic Republic in their quest for autonomy. However, internal disagreements on both sides hindered negotiations, and by the early 1980s, the Kurdish rebellion was brutally quashed. Despite these setbacks, the KDPI and Komala, another Kurdish political party, continued their armed struggle from exile in Iraq. Both groups were plagued by internal divisions. In the late 1980s, the KDPI attempted to reopen negotiations with Tehran, but their leaders were assassinated abroad. By 1993, the Kurdish insurgency had dwindled to sporadic hit-and-run attacks, facing severe state repression. Despite this, Kurdish national sentiment remained robust, fueled by economic neglect and authoritarian rule. The Kurds' primary demand was still autonomy, although some began to advocate for secession. This journey through the 20th century reveals the rise of a mass-based Kurdish nationalist movement in Iran, which persisted despite harsh repression from successive regimes.

The Kurdish nationalist movement in Iraq, born in the 1920s, has been a tumultuous journey of tribal revolts, political fragmentation, and relentless struggle for autonomy, marked by periods of brutal persecution and genocide.

The Kurdish nationalist movement in Iraq started from the 1920s and was going up to the late 1980s. The birth of Kurdish nationalism in Iraq can be traced back to the educated urban class in the 1920s and 1930s. This group started to question the authority of traditional tribal leaders. Secret groups like Hiwa and Darkar were established, creating a bridge between the urban intellectuals and some tribal leaders. This early wave of nationalism was primarily a reaction to the Iraqi government's failure to uphold the promised minority rights for Kurds. Moving forward to the tribal revolts led by Mulla Mustafa Barzani in 1943-45 and again in 1961-70 against the Iraqi government. Although these revolts had a nationalist flavor, they were mainly a result of the government's persecution of Barzani and his tribe. These revolts showcased Barzani's military skills but also highlighted the urban nationalist movement's limited reach among the rural tribes. After the 1961 revolt, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), led by Barzani and Ibrahim Ahmad, officially joined the fight against the government. However, the KDP was split between tribal leaders like Barzani, who were focused on autonomy, and leftist urban intellectuals who were more interested in national liberation and social reform. The narrative takes a turn when Iraq's Ba'ath party came to power in 1968. Initially, they reached an agreement with Barzani and the KDP to grant autonomy to the Kurds. However, disagreements over including Kirkuk in the autonomous region and Barzani's external alliances soured the relationship. Fighting resumed in 1974-75, culminating in a Kurdish defeat and Baghdad imposing a limited autonomy deal. During the 1970s and 80s, the KDP fragmented due to internal conflicts, leading to the formation of groups like the PUK and KSP. The Kurdish community was further divided between those who chose to cooperate with Baghdad and those who continued the insurgency. The final part of our journey takes us to the late 1980s, a dark period marked by Iraqi military campaigns like the Anfal, which resulted in the genocide of Kurdish civilians, destruction of villages, and forced relocation. Despite their weakened and divided state, the Kurds continued their guerrilla activities. They received some external support, but their efforts towards autonomy were hampered by regional powers. This journey provides a comprehensive overview of the key political and military developments in the Kurdish nationalist struggle in Iraq during this period.

The resurgence of Kurdish nationalism in Turkey, from the 1950s to the 1990s, has been a tumultuous journey of alliances, protests, repression, insurgency, and resilience.

Kurdish nationalism in Turkey started from the 1950s and stretched into the 1990s. In the 1950s, a significant shift occurred when the Democratic Party rose to power. They formed an alliance with Kurdish landowning elites, known as aghas, promising them benefits in return for votes. This strategic move revived the influence of tribal leaders, which had been suppressed under the previous single-party rule of the Kemalists. Meanwhile, in the cities, a small number of educated Kurds began to express their Kurdish identity more openly through publications such as Ileri Yurt. Moving into the 1960s and 1970s, leftist student and worker parties, like the Turkish Workers Party, gained popularity among Kurds. They addressed issues of inequality and poverty in eastern Turkey, which resonated with the Kurdish population. At the same time, underground Kurdish parties, such as the KDPT, began to surface. Kurdish protests and unrest escalated, met with repression from the Turkish state. Many Kurds migrated west to cities like Istanbul and Ankara, forming communities in exile. The 1980s brought a military coup and with it, increased oppression of Kurdish identity and language by the Turkish state. However, in 1984, the militant Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) launched an insurgency, ambushing Turkish forces and assassinating Kurdish landlords. The PKK's goal was an independent Kurdish state. Despite their ruthless tactics, they gained support among disaffected Kurdish youth. The state retaliated with village guard militias, evacuations, and increased troops, displacing hundreds of thousands of people. The conflict reached a fever pitch in the 1990s, with thousands losing their lives. The PKK gained mass support, with protests and riots erupting in Kurdish cities. Some Turkish politicians recognized the need for compromise, granting limited cultural rights and allowing a Kurdish political party. However, Turkish nationalism remained a powerful force, and systematic human rights abuses against Kurds continued. The PKK declared ceasefires in 1993 and 1998, hoping for negotiations, but Turkey refused to make concessions. In 1999, the capture, trial, and death sentence of PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan dealt a significant blow to the PKK. While this led to a decrease in violence, the Kurdish identity and the desire for rights remained strong. The Kurdish nationalist movement that emerged throughout the 20th century, despite violent suppression, became an unstoppable force that Turkey has struggled to accommodate. This is the story of the contentious rise of Kurdish nationalism within an oppressive Turkish nation-state.

The Treaty of Sevres in 1920 proposed the creation of an autonomous or independent Kurdish state but was never implemented due to Turkish opposition.

In 1920, after World War I, the Treaty of Sevres was inked between the Ottoman Empire and the Allied Powers. This treaty detailed plans to divide the former Ottoman territories, with specific clauses addressing the regions populated by the Kurds. One of these clauses, Article 62, suggested the creation of a Commission. This Commission, composed of British, French, and Italian members, was tasked with creating a plan for local autonomy for the Kurdish regions located east of the Euphrates River and south of Armenia. This had to be done within a six-month timeframe. The Commission was also responsible for visiting the region to determine if any adjustments were necessary to the borders between Turkey and Persia. Following this, Article 63 stipulated that Turkey had to agree to and carry out the decisions made by the Commission within three months. Moving on to Article 64, it was stated that if, within a year, the majority of the Kurdish population in these regions requested independence from Turkey and the Council deemed them capable of being independent, Turkey would be obligated to grant it. This would mean Turkey renouncing all rights and claims over these areas. The specifics of this renunciation would be outlined in a separate treaty between Turkey and the Principal Allied Powers. It was also stated that the Allied Powers would not oppose if the independent Kurdish state included Kurds from the Mosul Vilayet.

The Kurdish minority in Syria has endured a century-long struggle for recognition and autonomy, marked by political suppression, forced relocations, and statelessness.

Let's take a look at the Kurdish minority in Syria, which makes up about 8-10% of the total population. These Kurdish communities are primarily located in three regions: the Kurd Dagh mountain area, the northern Jazira near the Turkish border, and the northeastern corner of Jazira near Iraq. They communicate in the Kurmanji Kurdish dialect. Going back to the early 20th century, Kurdish leaders in Damascus sided with the Ottoman authorities against Arab nationalism. This was during the French mandate, and the Kurds played a significant role in quelling Arab revolts, which led to a deterioration in relations. By the 1930s and 40s, calls for Kurdish autonomy began to surface in the Jazira region. When Syria gained independence in 1946, Arab nationalism took center stage. This led to an increase in discrimination against the Kurds and a suppression of Kurdish political activity. The clandestine pro-Kurdish KDPS party was established in 1957. In a significant move in 1962, Syria revoked the citizenship of 120,000 Kurds in al-Hasaka province. The following year, the Ba'th party seized power and intensified the crackdown on the Kurds. In 1973, Syria established an “Arab belt” by forcibly relocating Kurds from the Turkish border area. Fast forward to today, and the discrimination against the Kurds continues. The Kurdish language is still prohibited, Kurdish names are not officially recognized, and hundreds of thousands of Kurds are stateless. There are dozens of illegal pro-Kurdish parties in existence. Since the 1980s, Syria has been a host to the PKK, allowing it to launch attacks on Turkey, but was forced to expel it in 1998 due to pressure from Turkey. Syria perceives the Kurds as pawns of foreign powers. While the Kurds continue to face repression, the majority now strive for integration rather than separatism. This is a snapshot of the strained relationship between the Kurds and the Arab nationalist state in Syria.

The marginalized Kurdish minority in Lebanon grapples with poverty, discrimination, and an uncertain legal status, trapped within a divided sectarian system.

Imagine a group of people, over 100,000 strong, living in a country where they are considered a minority. These are the Kurds in Lebanon, who began migrating there in the 1920s-1950s from Turkey and in the 1950s-1960s from Syria. They didn't settle in the best parts of town, but rather in the slums around Beirut, working as urban laborers. When the civil war broke out in Lebanon in 1975, the Kurds found themselves in the crosshairs. They were targeted and expelled by Christian and Shiite militias, causing tens of thousands to flee the country. Today, they remain one of the most marginalized groups in Lebanon. One of the biggest challenges the Kurds face is the issue of citizenship. Before 1940, they could become citizens after living in Lebanon for five years. However, the laws were changed to prevent Muslim immigration and maintain Christian dominance. As a result, only about 60% of Lebanese Kurds are citizens today. The rest are either "under consideration" or don't have any papers at all. In response to these challenges, a few pro-Kurdish parties emerged, with connections to Iraqi Kurdish leaders Barzani and Talabani. However, these parties didn't manage to address the basic economic and social needs of the Kurdish community. Since 1976, with Syria's dominance, Kurdish political activity has been limited. The Kurds feel neglected by Lebanese leaders and struggle with poverty, discrimination, and an uncertain legal status. Despite these challenges, they remain trapped within Lebanon's divided sectarian system. This paints a picture of the difficult situation faced by the marginalized Kurdish minority in Lebanon, who are struggling to effectively advocate for their rights.

The Kurds in the Caucasus, a marginalized community with shifting loyalties and identities, face an uncertain and precarious existence.

In the Caucasus region of what was once the Soviet Union, there is a population of approximately 500,000 Kurds. These communities are primarily located in Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia. While the majority of these Kurds practice Sunni Islam, there are also Yazidi minorities among them. The presence of Kurds in the Caucasus dates back centuries. Some lived as nomadic tribes, while others settled as soldiers during periods of Muslim expansion. The 18th and 19th centuries saw significant migrations from Iran and Ottoman territories. The Yazidis, facing persecution in Turkey, sought refuge in Christian Armenia and Georgia. During the era of the Soviet Union, the Kurds were acknowledged as one of over 100 nationalities. In 1923, an autonomous Kurdish province was established in Azerbaijan, but it was dissolved in 1930 due to concerns about nationalist agitation. The following decade saw thousands of Kurds from the Caucasus being deported to Central Asia. The 1980s brought about a period of glasnost, during which many Kurds began to reconnect with their identity. However, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan resulted in the displacement of 18,000 Kurds. Efforts to reestablish Kurdish autonomy in Azerbaijan were unsuccessful. Armenia took over the Kurdish regions of Azerbaijan, leading to the displacement of 60,000 Kurds who are still displaced within Azerbaijan today. Among the Yazidis in Armenia, some emphasize their Kurdish identity and support the PKK, while others downplay it to demonstrate their loyalty.

Home

A Modern History of the Kurds - Book Summary (2024)

David McDowall

The book "A Modern History of the Kurds" provides a comprehensive account of the political, social, and historical journey of the Kurdish people from the 19th century to the present day. It delves into the complexities of Kurdish identity, their struggle for autonomy, and their interactions with regional and global powers.

Key Ideas

It's important to understand that defining the Kurds isn't a simple task - they're not a homogeneous ethnic group with a shared lineage. Instead, they've evolved from various Indo-European tribes that migrated into the region over many centuries. Their language reflects this diversity, with multiple dialects spoken. In terms of religion, the majority are Sunni Muslim, but there are also significant minorities who follow Alevism, the Ahl-i Haqq faith, Yazidism, and other beliefs, indicating a wide range of origins.

In terms of politics and social structure, Kurdish society has traditionally been governed by a tribal system and kinship ideology. Tribes are dynamic entities that can include sub-groups with different ancestries but common interests. Tribal chiefs play a crucial role in mediating relationships with the state and the outside world. This position often puts them in conflict with states that seek to exercise direct control over their territory and people. As a result, states have frequently attempted to integrate chiefs into their ruling systems as a means of managing tribes.

While the influence of tribalism has decreased as modern states have grown more powerful, the ideology of kinship remains a powerful force among Kurds, even those who have settled in cities. Other groups, such as Armenian Christians, Jews, and non-tribal Kurdish peasants, often lived in servitude alongside the tribes. Urban Kurds have historically looked down on tribal values.

For many centuries, Kurdish identity was defined more by shared geography, language, and customs than by ethnic nationalism. The first known depiction of the Kurds as a distinct people is found in a 17th-century poem, which portrays them as an oppressed group surrounded by rival powers. In the early 20th century, Kurdish intellectuals began to create nationalist histories and promote a sense of ethnic identity.

However, the concept of a Kurdish nation in the modern sense is an 'imagined community', with its shape and boundaries subject to differing interpretations. The borders of Kurdistan with Iran and Iraq have been in place for centuries, facilitating pastoral migrations and providing a haven for rebels. These borders haven't been entirely negative, but they now significantly restrict the cross-border ties that are crucial to Kurdish nationalists.

The presence of oil and water resources in Kurdish regions also makes states reluctant to relinquish control. As a result, the Kurdish struggle involves wresting authority from states to achieve self-rule in the lands they inhabit. It also involves shifting the diverse Kurdish groups from loyalties based on kin, religion, class, or locale to an overarching ethnic identity. While some nationalist perspectives view the Kurdish nation as eternal, others argue that Kurdish ethnic nationalism only fully emerged in the 20th century. In truth, the Kurds have been both a clearly identifiable group for centuries and a modern nation shaped by recent intellectual and political efforts.

"A Modern History of the Kurds" by David McDowall is a comprehensive and detailed account of the Kurdish history from the 19th century to the present day. The book provides an in-depth analysis of the socio-political and economic struggles of the Kurdish people, their quest for national identity, and their continuous fight for autonomy and recognition in the Middle East. McDowall also explores the complex relationships between the Kurds and the states they inhabit, namely Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria, and the international community's role in the Kurdish issue.

10 Actions to Implement Learnings:

Empathize with the Kurdish Struggle: Understand the plight of the Kurds and empathize with their struggle for recognition and autonomy.
Educate Others: Share the knowledge gained from the book with others to raise awareness about the Kurdish issue.
Support Kurdish Culture: Explore and appreciate Kurdish culture, language, and traditions to understand their rich heritage and identity.
Stay Informed: Keep abreast of current events related to the Kurds and the Middle East to understand the ongoing developments.
Promote Peaceful Dialogue: Advocate for peaceful dialogue and negotiations as a solution to the Kurdish issue.
Support Human Rights: Stand against human rights violations committed against the Kurds and support organizations working for their rights.
Engage in Discussions: Participate in discussions and debates about the Kurdish issue to broaden your perspective and understanding.
Read More: Read more books and articles about the Kurds and the Middle East to deepen your knowledge.
Question Biases: Challenge your own biases and preconceived notions about the Kurds and the Middle East.
Advocate for Inclusion: Advocate for the inclusion and representation of the Kurds in the political processes of the countries they inhabit.