The rightful succession after Prophet Muhammad's death

The most contentious issue discussed was the disagreement over the legitimate successor to Prophet Muhammad after his death in 632 AD. The Shi'a view, argued extensively by Sultanu'l-Wa’adhim Shirazi, holds that Ali ibn Abi Talib, as cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet, was clearly designated as the next leader on several occasions by Muhammad himself. This is based on events like Ghadir Khumm where the Prophet supposedly proclaimed Ali as master to whoever accepts him as master, implying succession. Many verses and hadiths about Ali's closeness to the Prophet are cited as proofs. However, the Sunni view contends that Abu Bakr, elected at Saqifa, was the rightful successor. They argue this election, where some prominent companions backed Abu Bakr, reflected community consensus. They dispute the reliability of hadiths cited about Ali's designation. When Well-Wisher argues Abu Bakr and Umar conspired to deny Ali his position, taking over leadership, Sunnis counter they exercised good judgment to preserve Muslim unity. Well-Wisher details traumatic events like the attack on Fatima's house that injured her and allegedly led to her unborn child's death, which Sunnis reject as fabrications. Overall, this bitter succession dispute in many ways lies at the heart of most subsequent doctrinal divergences separating Shi'ism from Sunnism over time.

Interpretation of Quranic verses and hadiths

Certain pivotal Quranic verses concerning Ali and hadiths praising his superior merits and rights are extensively discussed and hotly debated. Well-Wisher systematically cites reference after reference from many respected Sunni scholars and historians, arguing verses like Quran 48:29, "And those who are with him are vehement against the unbelievers"), explicitly refer to Ali ibn Abi Talib's leadership qualities and special closeness to the Prophet. However Sunnis often seek to dismiss these as nothing but Shi'a distortions or misinterpretations, claiming such verses have more generalized meanings unrelated to succession. One especially contentious hadith Shi'as rely heavily upon is the so-called Hadith of Position: "man kuntu mawlahu fa Aliyyun mawlahu" which reportedly states Ali stands in the same relationship to the overall believing community as Prophet Muhammad himself, implicitly indicating his rightful leadership. While Shi'as consider this hadith sahih or fully authentic based on chains of narration, Sunnis either dispute its reliability entirely or attempt to explain away its implications since on face value it clearly positions Ali as holding precedence over Abu Bakr, Umar and other companions. Similar debates occur over multiple other Quranic verses and hadiths bestowing an elevated status, special honors, or familial rights upon Ali and the Ahlul Bayt more broadly. The background context influencing these varying interpretations stems from the bitter political succession dispute - Shi'as selectively draw upon such theological evidence to vociferously argue Ali's superior personal merits and qualifications, while Sunnis reject the same evidence to uphold Abu Bakr's legitimacy.

Actions and legitimacy of the early caliphs

Shi'as sharply criticize certain early caliphs, particularly Umar. Well-Wisher argues Umar severely transgressed Islamic tenets, citing his prohibition of mut'a (temporary marriage) as contradicting Quran and sunnah. He quotes Traditions showing the Prophet approved mut'a and never banned it, while Umar issued a prohibition himself since he considered it adultery. Shi'as argue only the Prophet has authority to declare acts lawful or not. Well-Wisher also details many errors and mistakes made by Umar, where his rulings on Islamic law had to be corrected by Ali, showing his relative lack of jurisprudential knowledge compared to Ali. He recounts several traumatic suppression incidents, like when Umar allegedly set fire to Fatima's house when supporters were gathered, resulting in her miscarriage. Sunnis strongly dispute such accounts as falsehoods, upholding Umar's piety and good judgments that stabilized the nascent Muslim community.

Status, knowledge and rights of Ahlul Bayt (Prophet's family)

The debates highlight the pivotal status accorded to the Prophet's family by Shi'ism in contrast to Sunnism. Numerous hadiths are cited by Well-Wisher praising the Ahlul Bayt, confirming their perfect purity from sin and errors in judgement or transmittal of Prophetic knowledge, underscoring their unique spiritual rank and rights due to their relationship and resemblance to the Prophet himself. Shi'as consider this a key criterion distinguishing the legitimate successors from others. Well-Wisher also argues the Quranic verse of purification (33:33) establishes the sinless status of Ahlul Bayt, showing errors did occur among ordinary companions and wives. Sunnis say ordinary companions were also esteemed and worthy Caliphs were among them, arguing hadiths praising Ali are unreliable or just signify what he generally merited rather than any specific succession right. They dispute literal sinlessness of Ahlul Bayt and wives, considering them fallible.

Visiting shrines and intercession of Imams

Sunnis heatedly condemned the controversial Shi'a practice of invoking and honouring tombs or shrines of their Imams. To strict Sunnis, any act of praying or seeking assistance from the dead constitutes clear polytheism and worship of others beside Allah. However Shi'a scholar Well-Wisher repeatedly clarifies worship and veneration represent drastically distinct acts: though sometimes in overwhelming love and desire to honour these holy persons Shi'as may prostrate physically at tombs, this could never constitute the formal ritual prayer of worship which indeed would breach creedal monotheism. Rather, it signifies extreme reverence for the special friends of Allah buried there. Shi'as uphold the mystical belief these Imams and martyrs remain spiritually alive not dead, residing in an exalted realm able to intercede and request blessings on their behalf before Allah's throne, just as Prophet Muhammad himself did in his lifetime. However, Sunnis adamantly maintain requesting intercession violates creed, as they believe no soul retains such powers after physically dying and leaving this worldly realm. In responding to accusations of polytheism against these practices, Well-Wisher also notes parallel phenomena of honoring tombs of unknown martyred soldiers or historical holy sites across religious traditions worldwide.

Sunni claims about founding of Shi'ism

Some Sunnis like Ibn Taymiyyah claim Shi'ism was founded by the Jew Abdullah Ibn Saba who allegedly feigned becoming Muslim then attributed divinity to mortal humans like Ali to corrupt Islam from within. Well-Wisher thoroughly debunks this myth, showing even classical Sunni scholars who transmitted this story admitted Ibn Saba was not truly known in early Islam and Shi'as masses never accepted such deviant beliefs about Ali. Mainstream Shi'ism has always upheld strict monotheism. He clarifies Shi'ism was formally founded later by twelve Imams from Prophet's family, arguing it represents original teachings, not some deviant strain. Extremists like ghulat who deify Ali are also strongly condemned by Shi'ism.

Temporary marriage (Mut'a)

The permissibility of mut'a, the temporary marriage, is debated. Sunnis claim Umar prohibited it absolutely in accordance with Prophet's wishes. Well-Wisher counters that nothing shows Prophet banned it himself. He argues Quran expressly allows mut'a, details rules on iddah period and dowries for these women, and has no abrogating verse banning it. Well-Wisher asserts Sahih hadiths mention even companions entering into mut'a marriages on journeys, clearly indicating Prophet permitted this. Reports claiming Prophet barred mut'a only at battles of Khaibar, Tabuk or general farewell pilgrimage are disputed by Well-Wisher as contradictory and unauthentic. He argues Umar's prohibition stems from his personal view it constitutes adultery, lacking Prophetic authority, highlighting continued adherence to mut'a by companions like Ibn Abbas even later.

Eighth Session, Thursday night, 1 Sha'ban, 1345 A.H.

Shi'as revere Ali for immense knowledge, often considered unequaled among companions. Numerous reports are cited showing Ali's answers to jurisprudential issues became established rulings while several incidents display caliph Umar's legal errors needing correction by Ali, contradicting the view of later Sunnis that Umar was foremost in rule-making expertise. Shi'as attribute this special wisdom of Ali to instruction by Prophet who ensured esoteric interpretation of Quran reached Ali. Well-Wisher argues instances like Ali's detailed prophesy of Imam Hussein's martyrdom demonstrate his unmatched knowledge granted by Allah as the wasi (executor) of Prophet's legacy. Sunnis say Ali's merits don't prove his superiority over other esteemed companions and early caliphs.

Knowledge and wisdom of Ali vs companions

Ali ibn Abi Talib, cousin and son-in-law to the Prophet Muhammad, was renowned for his bravery, wisdom, faith, honesty, unwavering dedication to Islam, deep loyalty to Muhammad, and eloquence as a speaker and leader. On multiple occasions, the Prophet named Ali as his successor, stating that those who follow Ali would be on the right path. Following the Prophet's passing, Ali chose not to claim his right to leadership immediately, in an effort to prevent conflict and maintain the unity of Islam. However, he later assumed the role of the fourth caliph. Ali embodied the Islamic principles of sacrifice, simplicity, knowledge, justice, and piety. He led a simple life, shunning luxury and decoration. Ali's ancestry was distinguished, tracing back to the Prophet Abraham. His forebears were monotheists, and he was born within the sacred confines of the Kaaba sanctuary. The Prophet acknowledged Ali as the most knowledgeable and virtuous among his companions, bestowing upon him the title of "Imam of the Pious". In the aftermath of the Prophet's death, Ali chose to remain silent for the sake of preserving Islam and preventing bloodshed among Muslims. He believed that the process of selecting Abu Bakr as caliph was not done correctly. Later in his life, Ali clarified that his initial decision not to assert his right to leadership was made to prevent the disintegration of Islam and to maintain unity among Muslims.

Authority and knowledge of the Imams

The final session of "Peshawar Nights" delves into the contentious issue of authority for interpretation and transmission of Islamic law and teachings, a fundamental difference between Sunni and Shi'a Islam. The Shi'a perspective, as articulated by Shirazi, emphasizes the unique role of divinely appointed leaders, specifically the twelve Imams, who are regarded as the only legitimate authorities in Islam. This belief is rooted in a Quranic verse that urges obedience to Allah, the Prophet Muhammad, and "those vested with authority." Shi'as interpret this as a direct reference to the divinely appointed, infallible Imams who are descended from Ali. These Imams, according to Shi'a belief, are not just political leaders but are endowed with prophetic authority, inheriting this mantle directly from the Prophet's family, the Ahlul Bayt. The Shi'as hold that the Ahlul Bayt possess a special status and knowledge, confirmed by numerous hadiths. Consequently, the Imams are seen as the rightful spiritual successors of Muhammad, entrusted with the definitive interpretation of Islam, including elucidating Quranic principles that are not detailed explicitly in the text itself. In contrast, the Sunni interpretation of "those vested with authority" is more expansive, typically encompassing political rulers and state officials, and does not subscribe to the notion of infallible Imams with divine prerogatives. This difference underlines a significant theological divergence between the two sects, with Shi'as viewing the Imams as Islam's rightful spiritual successors, a concept rejected by Sunnis. This session in "Peshawar Nights" thus highlights the deep-rooted theological underpinnings that shape each sect's understanding of Islamic governance and authority.

Home

Peshawar Nights - Book Summary (2024)

Sultan Al-Wa'izin Shirazi

Peshawar Nights is a transcript of a series of religious debates that took place over ten nights between Sultanu'l-Wa’adhim Shirazi, a Shi'i scholar, and Sunni scholars in Peshawar, India (now Pakistan) in 1927. The discussions cover major topics relating to Shi'ism including the death of the Prophet, successorship, companions, infallibility, Muta' (temporary marriage), and the family of the Prophet.

Key Ideas

Peshawar Nights is a compilation of dialogues that took place in 1927 in India. These dialogues were between a Shi'i scholar and Sunni scholars. The Shi'i scholar journeyed across the country, engaging in debates with well-known scholars. These debates drew large audiences, eager to gain insights from his wisdom. One of these debates, which took place in Peshawar with two scholars from Kabul, was even published in local newspapers. These accounts were later gathered and formed into a book that detailed the Peshawar debates.

The dialogues in the book serve to clarify the Shi'a perspective on early Islamic history and doctrine, using sources from both Sunni and Shi'a sects. Some of the key points discussed include the events surrounding Prophet Muhammad's death and the election of Abu Bakr as the first caliph, despite the Shi'a belief that Ali was the rightful successor. Other topics include the misinterpretation of hadiths that claim the companions were infallible, the seizure of Muhammad's daughter Fatima's property by Abu Bakr, the mistakes made under the rule of caliph Umar who relied on Ali's guidance, the oppression under caliph Uthman, and the opposition of Ali by Aisha, despite her being the wife of the Prophet's daughter Fatima. Shi'as place a high value on the authoritative transmission and interpretation of Islamic law through a line of Imams descended from Ali.

The debates facilitated a mutual understanding between the two sects through the exchange of ideas. The dialogues were conducted with respect and led to some Sunnis converting, along with an overall improved understanding between the two sects. The online version of the text has corrected issues with the quality of translation, including grammatical errors and spelling mistakes. It also standardizes the transliteration of Arabic to improve readability compared to the printed translation.

"Peshawar Nights" by Sultan Al-Wa'izin Shirazi is a comprehensive account of a series of religious debates that took place over ten nights in Peshawar, India (now Pakistan) in 1927. The debates were between Sultanu'l-Wa’adhim Shirazi, a Shi'a scholar, and two Sunni scholars, Hafiz Muhammad Rashid and Sheikh Abdu's-Salam. The book is a compilation of these debates, which were recorded by four reporters and published in local newspapers. The discussions revolved around significant topics related to Shi'ism, including the death of the Prophet, successorship, companions, infallibility, Muta' (temporary marriage), and the family of the Prophet. The book serves as a detailed bibliographic reference to hundreds of Sunni treatises, acknowledging the claims of the Shi'ites.

Ten specific actions that reflect the learnings from the book and can help implement these learnings into one's life are:

Engage in open dialogue and debate about religious beliefs and practices to foster understanding and tolerance.
Respect the diversity of religious thought and interpretation within Islam and other religions.
Seek knowledge from reliable sources and scholars to deepen understanding of one's faith.
Practice critical thinking and questioning when studying religious texts and traditions.
Understand the historical context of religious events and figures to gain a more nuanced understanding of one's faith.
Recognize the importance of succession in religious leadership and its impact on religious interpretation and practice.
Acknowledge the role of infallibility in religious leadership and its implications for religious authority and interpretation.
Understand the concept of Muta' (temporary marriage) within the context of Islamic law and ethics.
Appreciate the significance of the Prophet's family in Islamic history and tradition.
Strive for unity and understanding among different sects and interpretations within Islam.

Want a high quality book summary? Send us your wish!